Accurate determination of mineral chemical composition is essential for various aspects of geoscience, including economic geology, geochemistry, thermodynamic modelling, mineralogy, etc. With the increasing complexity of the rules for mineral definitions, accurate chemical analysis has become crucial for proper mineral classification. Electron microanalysis is the most widely used technique, employing energy-dispersive (EDS) and wavelength-dispersive (WDS) spectroscopies. While EDS enables rapid, simultaneous acquisition of X-ray spectra, its analytical performance is limited by relatively poor spectral resolution and higher detection limits, which often lead to significant peak overlaps and uncertainties in compositionally complex phases. WDS offers significantly better spectral resolution, improved peak-to-background ratios, and lower detection limits, enabling precise quantification even in compositionally complex minerals. These advantages minimize spectral interferences and allow precise determination of elements from major to trace concentrations, down to tens of µg/g. Modern WDS devices support advanced applications such as light element analysis (Be–O) and quantitative determination of Fe oxidation states. Despite longer analysis times and a more demanding analytical setup, WDS is therefore the preferred method for high-precision mineral analysis and is considered the standard approach in advanced mineralogical research and new mineral characterization. EDS is an invaluable tool for simpler geochemical systems and for providing initial, first-order characterization of compositionally complex minerals, and together with WDS they form a highly complementary and powerful analytical approach.
Keywords: mineral microanalysis, energy-dispersive spectroscopy, wavelength-dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray spectra.
Conflict of interest. The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
For citation: Škoda R. Electron microanalysis of minerals: the advantages and pitfalls of wavelength-dispersive spectroscopy for mineral characterization. Mineralogy, 2026, 12(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.35597/2313-545X-2026-12-2-5.

Received 18.05.2026, revised 28.05.2026, accepted 05.06.2026

Шкода Радек – доктор наук, доцент, Университет Масарик, г. Брно, Чехия; rskoda@sci.muni.cz

1. Bastin G.F., Heijligers H.J.M. (1991) Quantitative electron probe microanalysis of ultra-light elements (boron-oxygen). In: Electron probe quantitation. Boston, MA, Springer US, p. 145–161.
2. Cámara F., Oberti R., Chopin C., Medenbach O. (2006) The arrojadite enigma: I. A new formula and a new model for the arrojadite structure. American Mineralogist, 91 (8–9), 1249–259. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2006.2189
3. Fialin M., Chopin C. (2006) Electron-beam (5–10 keV) damage in triplite-group phosphates: Consequences for electron-microprobe analysis of fluorine. American Mineralogist, 91(4), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2006.1926
4. Fialin M., Bézos A., Wagner C., Magnien V., Humler E. (2004) Quantitative electron microprobe analysis of Fe3+/∑Fe: basic concepts and experimental protocol for glasses. American Mineralogist, 89(4), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2004-0421
5. Fialin M., Wagner C., Métrich N., Humler E., Galoisy L., Bézos A. (2001) Fe3+/∑Fe vs. FeLα peak energy for minerals and glasses: recent advances with the electron microprobe. American Mineralogist, 86(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2001-0409
6. Goldoff B., Webster J.D., Harlov, D.E. (2012) Characterization of fluor-chlorapatites by electron probe microanalysis with a focus on time-dependent intensity variation of halogens. American Mineralogist, 97(7), 1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2012.3812
7. Höfer H.E., Brey G.P. (2007) The iron oxidation state of garnet by electron microprobe: its determination with the flank method combined with major-element analysis. American Mineralogist, 92(5–6), 873–885. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2390
8. Klein C., Dutrow B. (2007) Manual of Mineral Science, 23rd. NJ, John Wiley & Sons, 704 p.
9. Lane S.J., Dalton J.A., (1994) Electron microprobe analysis of geological carbonates. American Mineralogist, 79 (7–8), 745–749.
10. Lavrent’ev Y.G., Karmanov N.S., Usova, L.V. (2015) Electron probe microanalysis of minerals: Microanalyzer or scanning electron microscope? Russian Geology and Geophysics, 56(8), 1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2015.07.006
11. Mrkusová E., Škoda R., Filip J. (2025) The electron microprobe flank method: A fresh approach to Fe³ quantification in tourmalines. TUR 2025-The 4th international conference on tourmaline. Antsirabe, Madagascar, Book of Abstracts, p. 5–6.
12. Nesse W.D. (2021) Introduction to mineralogy, 3rd ed. New York, Oxford University Press.
13. Plášil J., Sejkora J., Cejka J., Škoda R., Goliáš V. (2009) Supergene mineralization of the Medvědín uranium deposit, Krkonoše Mountains, Czech Republic. Journal of Geosciences, 54(1), 15–56. https://doi.org/10.3190/jgeosci.029
14. Plášil J., Veselovský F., Hloušek J., Škoda R., Novák M., Sejkora J., Čejka J., Škácha P., Kasatkin A.V. (2014) Mathesiusite, K5(UO2)4(SO4)4(VO5)(H2O)4, a new uranyl vanadate-sulfate from Jáchymov, Czech Republic. American Mineralogist, 99(4), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2014.4681
15. Raudsepp M. (1995) Recent advances in the electron-probe micro-analysis of minerals for the light elements. The Canadian Mineralogist, 33, 203–203.
16. Reed S.J.B. (2005) Electron microprobe analysis and scanning electron microscopy in geology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 189 p.
17. Stormer J.C., Pierson M.L., Tacker R.C., (1993) Variation of F and Cl X-ray intensity due to anisotropic diffusion in apatite during electron microprobe analysis. American Mineralogist, 78(5–6), 641–648.